2 Manipulation Tactics To Watch Out For In A Partner, By A Psychologist

“Plausible deniability” is about maintaining just enough ambiguity that someone can deny harmful intent. It often sounds like “I was just joking,” “You’re too sensitive” or “That’s not how I remember it.” These statements deny any responsibility on the speaker’s part, and distort your perception of what’s really going on.

In intimate relationships, this becomes a psychological weapon that emotionally abusive or manipulative partners use to keep their victims confused, off-balance and questioning their own reality.

Here are two psychological tactics behind plausible deniability, and how it keeps victims stuck in cycles of self-doubt.

1. Hiding Behind Ambiguity

Most abusive relationships don’t necessarily begin with screaming matches. They can start with offhand remarks, subtle put-downs or boundary violations that are easy to brush off at first. You might feel slight discomfort but convince yourself it was a joke or something not worth making a fuss about.

This early ambiguity is often strategic on the part of the perpetrator. By keeping their behavior just vague enough and counting on you to keep the peace, a manipulative partner creates room to dodge accountability while you’re left decoding what just happened.

This tactic works well for them. According to a 2020 study published in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, most people are far less likely to identify nonphysical abuse such as manipulation or emotional control as “real” abuse.

Our internal definitions of intimate partner violence are often biased toward the visible and dramatic ones consisting of raised voices, bruises and threats. But emotional abuse can be harder to put a name to. It shows up in comments like:

• “I didn’t mean it that way.”
• “You’re taking things too seriously.”
• “Why are you so sensitive all the time?”

The researchers also found that people rarely identify these nonphysical behaviors as abusive unless specifically prompted, especially if they hold flawed romantic beliefs such as “jealousy equals love.” This gap in recognition is what often keeps people stuck in abusive relationships, leaving them questioning themselves instead of the behavior they’re being subjected to.

The harm is real, but because it’s wrapped up in ambiguity, it becomes harder to name, harder to validate and harder to leave.

2. Subtle Forms Of Gaslighting

Gaslighting is often thought of as overt manipulation — someone flat-out denying something they said or did, making you feel “crazy” for remembering it differently. But in relationships where partners hide behind plausible deniability, gaslighting can take on a subtler form. This can look like a shrug, a dismissive laugh or a “You’re reading too much into it,” and the intent is entirely to undermine you.

Instead of always telling you your version of events is wrong, an emotionally manipulative partner plants seeds of uncertainty that make you question your own truth. They might even flip the script to make you feel like you did something wrong, saying things like “Why do you always assume the worst of me?” This deters you from questioning them further and instead leads the conversation toward you having to appease them.

Such partners leave just enough space for you to wonder if maybe you’re the one misinterpreting things. And because you might be someone that’s introspective, compassionate and fair-minded, you entertain the possibility that you’re wrong. You might start analyzing yourself instead of the harm the other person caused. Over time, this dynamic rewires your instincts.

You may start responding in the following ways:

• You begin to apologize for being hurt, not just for any wrongdoing.
• You preemptively edit what you say to avoid future conflict or confusion.
• You start to wait for their interpretation of reality before trusting your own.

A 2023 qualitative study of gaslighting survivors found that abuse typically occurred in relationships that oscillated between affection and control, making the manipulation even more disorienting.

Over time, victims reported a weakened sense of self, growing mistrust in others and a fading confidence in their own perceptions. Many described feeling as though they had to “earn clarity” in their relationships, only to be met with more confusion.

Recovery often began only after leaving the relationship and re-engaging in relationships and activities that helped them reconnect with their truth.

Without realizing it, you stop trusting your emotional compass. You defer your truth in favor of preserving peace. And slowly, you hand over the narrative of your life to someone who benefits from you staying confused.

How Does ‘Plausible Deniability’ Really Hook You?

Plausible deniability is effective because it taps into two powerful human instincts: the need for certainty and the fear of shame. And it’s not just “what” is said that creates this confusion, but “how” it’s said, and how we’re conditioned to respond to it.

1. Our need for coherence. Human beings are wired to seek clarity, especially in close relationships, where emotional safety depends on being able to make sense of what’s happening.

So, ambiguity can feel deeply uncomfortable. When someone offers even a vaguely plausible explanation like “I didn’t mean it like that,” or “You’re misunderstanding me,” we often latch onto it, because the alternative is too hard to bear.

A 2022 study published in Personal Relationships examining emotionally abusive communication found that abusers often deliver these attacks through indirect, vague or superficially polite strategies, like backhanded comments, sarcastic jokes or pointed silences.

These tactics are hard to label clearly as abusive, which makes them easier to overlook or rationalize. Victims, in turn, are more likely to give the other person the benefit of the doubt, because their language doesn’t “sound” like abuse. The message stings but the way it’s said creates just enough doubt to make us pause, explain it away or blame ourselves for overreacting.

2. The shame loop. The researchers of the 2022 study also found that people on the receiving end of indirect attacks also end up responding with silence, politeness or attempts to smooth things over.

This is what makes plausible deniability especially damaging. The behavior is hard to name and harder to prove, creating just enough ambiguity to keep you quiet. You wonder if you’re being too sensitive, too reactive or too dramatic. You hesitate to speak up because it feels like you need a “better” reason, one that would rightfully justify the discomfort.

So you don’t say anything. And in that silence, the pattern continues. The longer you stay quiet, the more your shame deepens:

• “If it were really abuse, wouldn’t I know for sure?”
• “If no one else sees it, maybe it’s just me.”

But psychological abuse festers precisely in that grey zone. It doesn’t need to be loud to be effective, it just needs to make you question your own experience.

Here’s What To Look For To Break Free

To truly break free from such tactics, the inner work becomes about finding your way back to you and rebuilding the part of you that knows what’s true before it gets talked out of it.

Here’s what that deeper process might involve:

1. Validating without proof. Start practicing the radical act of believing yourself, even without external validation. The moment you feel something’s off, even if it seems “small” or you can’t yet explain why, let that be enough to pay attention.

2. Separate discomfort from doubt. Abusers rely on your discomfort being misread as self-doubt. Learn to sit with the unease without rushing to explain it away. “This feels wrong” is a complete sentence. Let that discomfort be information, not something to argue with.

3. Deconstruct the need to justify. Often, we don’t leave harmful dynamics because we can’t find the perfect reason. But part of healing is unlearning the belief that your pain needs to be legible to others to be valid. If it’s costing you your peace, that’s reason enough.

4. Strengthen internal referencing. Instead of asking, “Was it really that bad?” ask, “How did that feel to me?” Instead of wondering, “Would someone else be upset?” ask, “Do I feel okay with this?” This shift from external to internal referencing is what begins to rebuild inner authority, the part of you that doesn’t need to be “convinced” to act in your own best interest.

5. Find people who mirror you back to yourself. One of the most healing things in recovery from psychological abuse is being around people who don’t require proof to believe you. Choose spaces where your reality isn’t up for debate. A safe space is a psychological necessity.

Breaking free from plausible deniability isn’t just about spotting manipulation. It’s more about unlearning the reflex to abandon yourself to preserve someone else’s comfort.

Do you feel like you were “too much,” “too sensitive” or always the one who had to adjust? Take the science-backed Relationship Control Scale to learn whether you experience a lack of control in your relationships.