Why The Future Of Quality Is Still Human-Led

Ruslan Desyatnikov is Founder and CEO of QA Mentor, Inc., an independent software-testing company headquartered in New York.

As artificial intelligence, automation and machine learning rapidly transform software development, one question rises to the top for quality assurance professionals: What role will human testers play in this evolving landscape?

That very question inspired me to coin the term “human intelligence software testing” (HIST). This isn’t simply a counter to the rise of artificial intelligence testing—it’s a much-needed redefinition of how we perceive and value the contributions of human testers in a world increasingly run by machines.

Why We Need A New Perspective

For too long, the term “manual testing” has carried an unfair stigma. It’s often viewed as basic or inferior compared to automation, performance or security testing. In many companies, manual testers are treated as junior-level roles while automation engineers are seen as more advanced.

That mindset is both outdated and risky. It downplays the essential skills like critical thinking, creativity and intuition that human testers bring to the quality assurance (QA) process. Overlooking these traits can jeopardize product quality, customer satisfaction and overall business success.

Let me be clear: Human intelligence software testing is not manual testing. It’s not exploratory testing. It’s a broader, deeper and more strategic approach.

What Human Intelligence Software Testing Is

HIST is a philosophy and a skill set. It highlights what only humans can bring to testing—not just execution, but thoughtful analysis and insight. This type of tester:

• Thinks critically about requirements and questions what’s missing or unclear.

• Spots gaps, inconsistencies and vague acceptance criteria from wireframes or user stories.

• Applies intuition and real-world experience to uncover unexpected issues.

• Assesses usability and user experience from a human perspective.

• Draws connections between unrelated behaviors to identify subtle risks.

• Chooses the right automation tools and AI platforms, applying them effectively without depending on them blindly.

These testers are not just task performers. They’re investigators, strategists and quality champions.

It’s Not Anti-Automation—It’s Pro-Strategy

While HIST could be misunderstood to mean avoiding automation, this couldn’t be further from the truth. A human, intelligent software tester embraces automation but uses it strategically. They know when and where automation fits, how to pick the right tool for the task and how to combine it with human insight to get the best results. These professionals don’t just run scripts—they tailor them to serve a bigger picture: building better products.

In an AI-powered world, testers need to:

• Recognize areas where automation adds value and where it falls short.

• Guide AI tools, ensuring their outputs align with user needs.

• Validate that machine-generated results still make sense in real-world contexts.

• Think beyond pass/fail and ask whether the product is intuitive, trustworthy and truly ready.

Humans Leading AI; Not Competing With It

Artificial intelligence is excellent for pattern recognition, fast execution and predictive analytics. However, it doesn’t possess empathy, creativity or ethical reasoning. It can’t tell when something “feels off” or foresee how a confusing interface will frustrate users.

That’s where the human brain remains irreplaceable. Testers shouldn’t have to compete with AI—they should lead it, directing automated systems and intelligent tools in a way that ensures quality is not only efficient but meaningful.

A New Role For A New Era

As QA continues to evolve, testers must step into roles that are more collaborative, analytical and leadership-driven. Today’s testers are expected to be:

• Risk evaluators who make decisions based on product impact.

• User advocates who ensure real-world experience stays front and center.

• Automation architects who design maintainable frameworks.

• AI translators who understand and challenge machine-generated outputs.

• Quality influencers who shape product discussions from the beginning.

Why This Matters Right Now

Agile, DevOps and continuous delivery have accelerated software release cycles. Testing is often compressed or automated by default, which increases the risk of missing important issues. HIST offers a way to keep quality high without slowing down progress. It gives organizations a framework where human judgment and technology work together.

The key to adopting HIST is starting early, applying static testing discipline at the requirements and design stages long before development begins. Define clear ownership for investigative testing within your teams to ensure accountability at every software development lifecycle (SDLC) milestone. Use automation strategically, not to replace testers, but to free them to focus on critical thinking, risk assessment and business validation.

This isn’t just about keeping up with change. It’s about making sure that progress doesn’t come at the cost of user trust.

Final Thoughts

While HIST is new, the thinking behind it isn’t. Many great testers have practiced this approach instinctively for years. The difference now is that we’re finally recognizing its value and can give it the name and respect it deserves.

In a world filled with tools and automation, we still need people who ask, “What if?” We need testers who challenge assumptions, think deeply and understand the product like a real user would.

Human intelligence software testing is not a trend—it’s a transformation. The testers who embrace it are doing more than just keeping up—they’re leading the way.

Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?